Noise reduction in Photoshop - a gamechanger?
![]() |
Dark eyed junco - D500 with 500mm PF & 1.4 TCiii teleconverter ISO 1600 1/200th f/8 |
Shooting with a long f/5.6 lens and teleconverter on a heavily clouded day was likely to result in low shutter speeds and/or high ISOs. Those thoughts were confirmed when my light meter readings showed well below three stops of underexposure at my previous settings, f/400 at 200 ISO sans teleconverter. A whole 5 stops difference.
I photographed the junco from my back yard. The truth is I have been under the weather and didn't feel up to doing any exploration. I only got one shot of the fellow before he disappeared. However, it was enough to download and play with on Photoshop.
Yes, I know - I have owned CS2, 4, and 6 - all of them bought and paid for, but now I am in the world of rent-a-program and paying too much. However, I can't deny the quality, and I am very much impressed with that the new noise reduction algorithm does for noise. Between the amount of cropping done, the high ISO, and the slowish shutter speed, I didn't expect the shot to turn out all that well. You can see the original shot and the RAW Photo sliders in image below.
![]() |
Full image from the above cropped photo. You can see that noise reduction was applied. |
I am using a new computer, much faster than my previous model. That's a good thing when applying noise reduction because it takes time to process the data. My old computer would take 40 or more seconds to do a single job; this one did it in 7 seconds flat.
I have to say that I am impressed with the noise reduction. If I am ever against the wall hand have to choose between a slow shutter speed or high ISO, I know that at least I have that going for me in my corner. I may have to go back to some of my older DSLR images, and maybe even play with the noise reduction from my iPhone - I wonder how well it performs on that?
Thanks for reading.
Eric Svendsen www.ericspix.com
Comments
Post a Comment