Effect of a polarizer on a rainbow - interesting results
![]() |
Above: Rainbow I photographed today while visiting Waterton National Park - no polarizer used. Below: The same rainbow, but the polarizer took the polarized light away, making it almost vanish. |

We have been at Waterton now for 4 days and have one day left. I like to get moving early in the morning because the light is usually better and there are less people about to get in the way. We were heading to Red Rock Canyon to photograph the gorge when a rainbow appeared ahead of us. It was a pretty good one and I pulled over right away to photograph it.
I have shot numerous rainbows, but have never had a polarizer with me and I used it for the second photo. The rainbow magically disappeared, or nearly, and only a trace of it was left. This, of course, is something you don't want to do when photographing one, but I was curious what the result would be.
It turns out that rainbows are caused by polarized light. In order to have a rainbow you need sunshine passing through falling rain. The spherical shape of the raindrops causes the light to be refracted. The brightness of the rainbow is based upon the angle of the sun (lower angles are better), the size of the raindrops (larger drops are better), and the sun being at full brightness. The light refracts going through the droplets and becomes polarized.
The polarizer negated the polarized light - but not all of it. By rotating the polarizer I could alter which parts of the rainbow disappeared. Although all of the rainbow was polarized, the angle of polarization was not the same for the entire thing and thus the polarizer affected only part of it. Isn't that interesting?
Thanks for reading.
Eric Svendsen www.ericspix.com
Comments
Post a Comment